Charles Panders To The Gay Community… Sort Of

Wow. The bigotry and unadulterated schism at the petting zoo is getting so thick and deep that I need hip waders. Have a lookie at this one.

Well what comes as a shock to me is not the fact that Anderson Cooper is gay – unlike to some, being gay is not taboo to me. In fact it never even crossed my mind when I watched him. What shocks me is the fact that Charles had the need to say that it would “come as a huge shock to … well, nobody, really”. When I watched Cooper I saw simply a guy relaying some news for a living. When I watch him now, I will see simply a guy relaying some news for a living. And I admire and applaud the guy for trying to adopt that Haitian baby at the time. True there are plenty of perfectly deserving American children and it is pretty sleazy to try and get one elsewhere quickly and cheaply to avoid the hassle of going through the American adoption process (such as that pig Angelina Jolie and Madonna) but I digress, I suppose.

What shocks me is that Charles in his preconceived notions suspected that Cooper liked men. And it is preconceived notions such as these that make him a left wing bigot. Anybody who sees skin, religion, sexual orientation or anything before they see a fellow human being is a bigot in my book, and the left’s propensity to act as bigoted as they want to just because they believe that they aren’t bigoted just doesn’t fly to those whose sphere of consciousness has the teeniest scintilla of logic. Call me an ignorant gearbox if you’d like, but the notion of Cooper being gay never crossed my mind until now.

Myself? I say good on Cooper for liking what he likes, as long as it isn’t children. And I further applaud him for not wearing a label describing which kind of genitals floats his boat on his lapel. Anyone who identifies him or herself primarily with what they like to see betwixt someone’s legs is shallow in my book. I hope that this revelation doesn’t serve as a detriment to Mr. Cooper’s career.

Here’s something odd:

Can someone tell me precisely what “Bernie” did to deserve a banning? Was it the errant “lol” he put into his post? And if so why was this blatant jab at Cooper’s gayness left intact with no repercussions or reprisals?

Or this one from his pal Space Jizz?

Why not SpaceJagoff? Why do you hate gay people? And for that matter Charles, why do you hate gay people so much that you’d allow that kind of spew on your site?

P.S. you’re fat and dumb.

Touché Charlay, However…

In his latest screed Charlie points out the rampant racism on Breitbart’s site.

Disclaimer: As much as I hate to do this I am in no way shape or form condoning this behavior – at all. I am going to attempt to point out the rampant hypocrisy you’ll find on LGF.

Okay now I have to hand it to him on this one, as there were many disgusting comments on the site. But there are some that don’t appear racist to me at all. Here are a few.

“Every one of them has been accused, investigated or convicted of a crime.”

“I hope they keep walking — right out of the country. A swift kick to their white-hating asses would be in order too.”

“Which part of BLACK caucus don’t you understand? That’s racist to the max.”

Here’s one that doesn’t mention black, white or otherwise.

“It’s not what you think people! There was a pole smokers for pedophiles fund raiser just down the street……….. These spunk chuggers just wanted to get good seats.”

“They stand there, with their racism on full display, and not a single one of them realizes that they, themselves, are the racists/bigots. The old, ingrained plantation mentality blinds them all.”

And here is another that doesn’t pang of racism whatsoever.

“To bad there wasn’t a drive by or a runaway bus while they were gathered all together.”

And another.

“The leaves on the tree of liberty are starting to look a little dry.”

Here is one I actually tend to agree with:

“I think it’s time to bring back the old derogatory names which were used against these race baiters as they have not progressed beyond race and probably never will.”

And another I agree with.

“Black Congressional Caucus ’ values and mentality are skin deep only”

I mean, is this not true? Just look at the name: “Black Congressional Caucus”. Imagine the furor over a “White Congressional Caucus”. The next one outlines this nicely:

“Where is the White Caucus, to protect White people from these racists?”

I am not trying to mitigate the silliness over there at all. Yeah, there were plenty of ridiculous posts. But really, Charles is pretty much making some stuff up as he goes along. Just look at the previous post made by Daedalus. Slingshot? Really?

We need to keep in mind that this caucus only allows black people to join. Many are overtly racist themselves by mere virtue of this. If they lived up to the same standards that they foist upon others then they wouldn’t even exist. I don’t care what color you are, and no matter what organization you are in, if you don’t allow others to join because of their skin color then you are racist. Period.

Here are some prime examples. Here you see Black Caucus attendees using pejoratives about the Tea Party and calling Allen West and Herman Cain “oreos”.

Just do a search on Google Video for “congressional black caucus racist” and you’ll find a virtual treasure trove.

I concede that there were absolutely atrocious comments there on Breitbart’s site, but had Charles not purged some 15,000 people from his site you’d see similar comments. And just because the comments are not on his site does not mean that people don’t attempt to post drivel like that there. The only reason you don’t see it is because he and his minions-in-charge watch it like hawks.

Party Time For Charlie!

Once again it’s party time over at the swamp. Charles is practically as giddy as a schoolgirl over this one.

Charles sees this as a victory for his “side” as he sees it as a thumb in the eye of the right. But it’s a pyrrhic victory, at best. Of course not to him, as he doesn’t see the hypocrisy in this. The rest of us here on planet earth mourn the loss of possibly hundreds of innocent lives and the lives of two American federal agents. Charles and his pals revel in the fact that what they see as a “right wing agenda” is being shot down by like minded individuals. Evidence of this can be seen here:

Will someone please smack these sickening bastards upside the head and remind them that because of this boondoggle there were innocent lives taken, with very little if anything to show for it? These individuals cannot tell the forest from the trees – and like I have said before, they wear very effective blinders. Myself? I could give two piles of manure what letter you have next to your name. If you have an (R), (D) or whatever it does not matter. This whole situation was a complete disaster, the most tragic consequences being the loss of life. But once again, what’s a few brown people? The Obama camp r winnar!

The cruelty and inhumanity of LGF is insurmountable at this point. They are too far gone now. They are beyond help as they believe that they and others like them are beyond reproach. The only thing left to do is harangue and blow them out of the water whenever is necessary.

I’d say it is necessary approximately 100% of the time. What say you?

A Brief Lesson In Hypocrisy 101

The title says it all, really – especially when you do a little legwork.

The butter troll has outdone himself this time. In spite of his vitriolic criticism of Mitt Romney for outsourcing work overseas, Obama himself outsourced jobs for his presidential campaign to a travel booking firm that operates in India and China of all places. Egencia, a division of Expedia had plenty of business from Obama for America. Business must be great for Egencia, too – here is a look at some of the open positions at this company:

Need I really say more about this?

Now This Is Beyond Painful

With idiotic posts such as what Charles banged out this morning, it is obvious to anybody with two functioning glial cells that he didn’t “fall short of the grace”, he outright jumped into the abyss.

Absolutely amazing. Check this out. I took a screen shot for posterity.

Folks, you can’t make this stuff up. For the life of me I cannot understand this cat’s way of thinking and to be honest, I am glad that I cannot understand. There must be cognitive dissonance here, as I have no idea how someone could be so glaringly frigging obtuse and idiotic. The outrage expressed in this matter is more than justified. And the only “psychotic frenzy” I see here is Charles’ mad dash to mold minds.

Charlie? Are you reading carefully? Good – look very closely here. I will attempt to use monosyllabic words so that even the likes of you can understand.

Innocent. People. Frigging Died.

But then again, hey – what’s a few (hundred) brown people? Out of sight, out of mind. And the federal agents? Just more martyrs for the cause against the second amendment.

But I digress. Then again, so do most of the people commenting there.

No bigotry to see here, move along.

Fast and Furious was a Bohemian circle jerk from day one. None of the weapons had tracking devices, which is in stark contrast to the Bush administration’s “Wide Receiver” which netted at least 1400 arrests. Fast and Furious did not have the cooperation of the Mexican government; in fact, they were never even notified. ATF agents were ordered not to follow the purchasers. Hell they didn’t even use aircraft, let alone tracking devices.

It is estimated that at least 200 Mexican citizens were killed with these weapons. I submit to anybody reading this, that just one innocent death caused by this disaster is a complete outrage and should immediately be answered with prosecution. But no, Obama had to protect his little guy with executive privilege. And always remember, if someone is hiding something it is obvious they don’t want you to see something. The Obama crew is doing what they can to refuse to turn anything over to the Department of Justice. This is not outrageous to the LGF parasites, but as usual Charbles (yes I misspelled that purposely) has something very profound to add to the subject: another meaningless, blithering comment about his new obsession – Twitter.

It is so amazing to me that people still look at that site and how much of the proverbial Kool-Aid that the “old-schoolers” chuggled.

Daedalus Update: Charles now claims Fast and Furious never happened.

I have no words.


He doesn’t have words, but sometimes none are necessary.

Let’s Play Cherry Pick With Charlie!

Yes sir, Charles is at it again. In his posting entitled: “Texas GOP Releases Platform, Goes Full Wignut” he strains his little stepladder once again to pick out the bits that he finds to be the most savory. I would like to take a few moments to trundle through this morass of intellectual roadkill to dissect this nonsense:
Okay, the rungs begin to groan under the pressure with:

And what is the problem here? The Republican party has never made any bones about its religious background; the very founding of the Republican party was promulgated on the abolition of slavery as commanded by God. So we have no surprise here.

Call me an ignorant rube if you’d like. I guess that I am too overburdened by the sheer weight of my guns and God to be able to grasp the issue with this. All sarcasm aside, in a free enterprise society one needs the government and its virtually limitless resources to stay the hell out of the way.

Note here where Charles emboldens the text:

Notice how he ignored the bit about undermining parental authority? Well in the mind of Charles the gub’ment is a much better parent than you are, right? The avaricious, double dealing old bastard would have his own ideology influencing your children before you exercise your own right to raise your child the way you want to. Interesting, coming from a guy who has never raised a child in his life.

Now notice how Charlie picks:

But conveniently left out the line prior to it, which states:

“We support equal suffrage for all U.S. Citizens of voting age who are not felons. We oppose any identification of citizens by race, origin, or creed and oppose use of any such identification for purposes of creating voting districts.”

Some of the next parts are paraphrased for space.

So one’s right to privacy ends where his right to be nosy and interfere with the upbringing of my son begins? I don’t think so.

Presumably he is taking umbrage with intelligent design being taught in school, yet I don’t see it mentioned here. Since it isn’t, we can assume that he is railing against debate or any discourse on the matter. In typical liberal fashion we see here their propensity to narrow their field of vision to only where their blinders allow. And why shouldn’t these things be discussed in class without the worry of being fired or disciplined?

He basically goes on and on, but his general disdain for anything not jibing with his own mindset is completely unabated. He no longer thinly veils his own discriminatory views as a means to “test the waters”, so to speak – with all of the troublesome conservatives gone, he can wave his hateful banner with his true colors showing.

Like Charles, I too encourage you to read it in its entirety, especially parts like the section entitled:


Where you’ll see:

“Campaign Contributions – We support full disclosure of the amounts and sources of any campaign contributions to political candidates, whether contributed by individuals, political action committees, or other entities.”


“We decry the appointment of unelected bureaucrats, and we urge Congress to use their constitutional authority to defund and abolish these positions and return authority to duly elected officials, accountable to the electorate.”

I mean, that is what democracy is supposed to be about isn’t it?

What’s pathetic however is that like he, the netizens of LGF fit in nowhere but LGF. I guess Charles should’ve rode the 9/11 gravy train a little while longer, eh?

More From The Peanut Gallery

For some reason, I cannot help but to hear dueling banjos in my head as I write this. It would seem that in his infinite “wisdom”, your friend and mine Jimmy Carter has very little good to say about the Obama administration. His latest review accuse the oval orifice of “widespread abuse of human rights”.

In a New York Times op-ed written June 24 (my birthday, whee!) he lambastes “The ONE” for “clearly violating” 10 of the 30 articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The farty old peanut farmer had this to say with regards to the use of unmanned drones to kill suspected terrorists:

“”Instead of making the world safer, America’s violation of international human rights abets our enemies and alienates our friends.”

I wonder what Charles would think, what with two of his own heroes arguing over who is “lefter than thou”. I imagine that this one will be swept under the carpet for the sake of keeping the far-left utopia over at LGF nice and … well, nice.