LGF’s Greatest Banned and [deleted]

During our recent quest to gather data on LGF’s vast list of blocked accounts, The Boiler Room discovered (or rather, was reminded of) the fact that the number of comments listed in any particular user account profile doesn’t include their [deleted] comments. And as Nodrog pointed out a while back, there are many prominent ex-LGFers who’ve had their entire commenting history scrubbed from the LGF archives. This becomes a complication if one is trying to quantify the contributions of these persona non gratas with relation to the site’s upcoming 9 million comment milestone (where those [deleted] comments are included in CJ’s grand total).

Not to worry, however, as engineer No. 4 was on the case and had it all figured out. Below is the spreadsheet file for the top 27 banned and [deleted] (or those who had more than 50 posts; No. 4 counted 252 accounts in all, but 132 of those posted just once, so we’re ignoring the rest for now):

As you can see, those 27 accounts contributed another 256,882 [deleted] comments to overall total.  So, if you add our latest “non-[deleted] comments of the banned” total to this “top [deleted] comments of the banned” total, we get a little over 45% of the current overall total comments:

3,793,792+256,882/8,964,531 = 0.451855652013474

And again, we know there are more comments of the banned out there. These lists are by no means exhaustive, and we keep finding more. Also keep in mind that it is more difficult to quantify comment data from the pre-registration era (up to mid-’04), as there were no accounts (and thus, no profiles) back then. So, at this moment, when we say 45%, we mean at least 45%.

But perhaps the most interesting revelation from this [deleted] list is the fact that these 27 accounts leave over 120 thousand positive net karma behind.

Bonus quiz: Did you notice that buzzsawmonkey and song_and_dance_man both have one (1) comment left standing in the archives? Well, why?  (and try not to burn a sock)


162 Comments on “LGF’s Greatest Banned and [deleted]”

  1. kansas says:

    OT, but the Michelle Bachmann thread got all of 42 comments. Even the psychopants are sick of that shit.

  2. Grand Junctionite says:

    Amazing work. I can see the DOD Pop Up on LGF now, Over 4 Milion Deleted!

  3. phoenixgirl says:

    what happened to babba? all of her comments were deleted as well…..can’t believe she didn’t make this list

  4. Grand Junctionite says:

    I can’t tell if her comments are erased but here are her stats.

    nic status karma comments
    babbazee blocked 4849 68,373 oct 18 2004

    • buzzsawmonkey says:

      Babba’s gotta have more comments than that in reality.

      • Grand Junctionite says:

        The *Blocked* spreadsheet the BRC has up has those stats.

      • Grand Junctionite says:

        The 68,373 that Babba has are second only to mandymanners at 127,281 as far as I can tell. Considering mandy lasted much longer and many of her comments consisted of one liners like, go piss up a rope, it’s a lot of posts.
        Compare Babba to Cato the Elder at 28,194 who registered in June 04 4 months prior or writermom at 28,490 in that same time period, babba comes across as pretty blogoriffic.

      • m says:

        I love me some {Writermom} too! ~:)

    • statistician says:

      babbazee is the 5th most prolific commenter in the history of LGF, exceeded only by MandyManners, realwest, Sharmuta, and Killgore Trout. Only 5 of her comments were deleted.

    • Nodrog says:

      Unless something new has occurred, BabbaZee has been blocked, but not obliterated.

  5. Formercorpsman says:

    test

  6. Formercorpsman says:

    I thought I was banned from here for a moment.

  7. garycooper says:

    What happened with Babba and Chunky? I missed that episode, as I wasn’t active there at the time of her banning. Was it something about Kahane?

    She didn’t like me, as I was foolish enough to make a few comments about the early history of the Jews, based on the Old Testament. I didn’t realize how much of a sore-subject that was, on the internets. So naive, I was.

    • phoenixgirl says:

      that is a very long story…….i think gordon has a slanted version on his banned and blocked site

    • m says:

      Babba is teh cool. I wish she would pop over every now and then!

      • RoboMonkey says:

        She pretty much keeps to her own site. I pop over there to see her every now and then.

      • wolfie says:

        Agreed. Babba is teh cool and the best.

        I thought the atmosphere at LGF took a huge dive down the tubes the minute she left.

        I used to visit Babba’s blog back when it had the old Haloscan. The new format is far too confusing for me. 😦

      • sacred ham says:

        I get the impression that Babba has long since moved on from spending any time discussing the Porky Pundit, and that she’d rather do her own thing rather than dwell on Chuck’s dysfunctionality. I may get to that point eventually, but for now I’m being entertained by the trainwreck.

        I don’t care what Chuck or Gordon or anyone else says, Babba definitely belongs in the Original Lizard Hall of Fame.

      • m says:

        Yeah I didn’t mean she had to pop over to diss chuck. Heck we’ll go for days, weeks even without mentioning chuck at theBlogmocracy.

        Comments excluded…

        ~:D

      • phoenixgirl says:

        i love babba

      • Nodrog says:

        I had my run-ins with BabbaZee, but she definitely belongs in the LGF hall of fame. And she definitely has moved on with her own psychedelic brand of zionist fascism (yes, I know, that’s a value judgment on my part). Anyway, she’s to be admired, even by those who violently disagree with her politics.

  8. garycooper says:

    Formercorpsman :I thought I was banned from here for a moment.

    That happens to me from time-to-time, too. Then I check in later, and see my comments posted. Weird deal.

  9. snowcrash says:

    momcat? That is rain of lead’s (from the blogmoc) wife! She seems so quiet and nice. Those are the ones you have to watch out for, they surprise you. Lol. Bet it was rain using his wifes nic.
    Also cutestguy was a sock of savage nation. I remember because who seriously names themselves cutestguy? I was totally suspicious.

  10. snowcrash says:

    Blogster ate another comment. Can someone in the front office aka bolier room make it leave me alone?

  11. Hera says:

    VOILA! ~:)

  12. kansas says:

    OT. Say the market seems to be tanking while Obumbles picks his bracket and plans his trip to Rio.

    • Grand Junctionite says:

      I saw him called President Passive today. If you want to be certain he will ignore your nuclear program or revolution, just start them during the final four or an important round of golf.

  13. freetaxkiller says:

    lgf’s .0001 stalker bait

    http://www.wattsupwiththat.com

    http://www.arapahoebasin.com
    got to love that snow

    Whatup with no Ludwigged Out,,,, we need a Ludwigged out fix….

    • Walter von Dichische says:

      Somebody over at PJ calling himself “A Physicist” (and wetting his pants about the “Chernobyl” happening in Japan) sounds somewhat like him. Not really sure.

      • Grand Junctionite says:

        Ludwig! Isn’t posting at PJM a bannable offense?

        A physicist

        The dream of a 100% risk free source of energy is a fairytale for nitwits …

        Just like the fairy tale that markets are efficient and rational …

        Just like the fairy tale that global warming is not a sobering reality …

        That none of these beautiful fairy tales are true, does not stop some folks from believing in them—the folks who urgently *desire* to believe in them.

        That’s why plenty of folks are arriving at a common-sense understand that the far-left and the far-right equally are delusional with regard to these fairy-tales.

        Fortunately.

      • snowcrash says:

        Comment3, “a scale of destruction that is unimaginable”. Very Lud like and un physicist like. BTW, I have been avidly following the updates at the link you posted for BNC Fukushima the other day. It is awesome. How come those scientists don’t sound like Ludwig at all? Lol

      • snowcrash says:

        Walt, check back later for my reply. I’m having a problem with my comments going to spam. Yes, I know they suck, but I’m not the only one.

      • Walter von Dichische says:

        He does seem to be able to do some basic calculations, but his logic goes something like:

        1. There’s hot shit there
        2. ???
        3. 11ty!!!!!11

        Dude needs to see a shrink. NOW.

      • Walter von Dichische says:

        Oy vey.

        A physicist
        Uhhh … because Howarts house-elves don’t have much experience dealing with massive reactor explosions and boiling fuel-rod pools?

        Seriously … what do you think these pictures are showing us?

        That the walls blew out from hydrogen in the building, like we’ve know for days, Loody?

      • Walter von Dichische says:

        He’s melting down:

        BREAKING NEWS: “SUICIDE MISSIONS” FOR TEPCO ENGINEERS

        What US Nuclear Regulatory Agency officials are saying not-for-attribution:

        “We are all-out urging the Japanese to get more people back in there to do emergency operation there, that the next 24 to 48 hours are critical,” the official said. “Urgent efforts are needed on the part of the Japanese to restore emergency operations to cool” down the reactors’ rods before they trigger a meltdown.

        “They need to stop pulling out people—and step up with getting them back in the reactor to cool it. There is a recognition this is a suicide mission,” the official said.

        No link, of course. Somebody needs to do an intervention.

      • Walter von Dichische says:

        Freeking full moon over there. Luddy’s got a buddy, and they’re howling “it’s gonna be worse than Chernobyl!!!!!11”.

        🙄

      • Emperor says:

        It would be hilarious if that was Ludwig, thought it could be just another like-minded, similarly-fake physicist.

  14. OldLineTexan says:

    buzzsawmonkey :Babba’s gotta have more comments than that in reality.

    Reality has nothing to do with LGF, Buzz.

  15. yankintheeu says:

    I didn’t know he actually deleted ALL of buzzsawmonkey’s archived posts, not merely the ones at the end. Is that not so incredibly weird?

    • Grand Junctionite says:

      Over 4 million deleted, yet he has no problem claiming he’s about to go over 9 million. It’s beyond weird.

      Look at my Blog, I’ve had 9 million comments! Oh, never mind those 4 1/4 million over there in thaT DELETED pile.

    • buzzsawmonkey says:

      He was pissed that I didn’t give him an opportunity to delete a “flounce”; instead, I came over here and went to zombie’s and posted my farewell on both sites, where he couldn’t touch it. Yertle should have known that, having coined the term “flounce,” I would know what to do when the time came.

      Yertle hit back the only way he could—by deleting my comments. However, I had prepared for that, too, and had already transcribed everything of value.

    • buzzsawmonkey says:

      Here’s why:

      Your Last Posting
      (Los Angeles)

      –apologies to Robert Browning and “My Last Duchess”

      That’s your last posting ever on this blog,

      And henceforth your account is blocked. You’ll dog

      My site no further with your words; your nic
      
Is banished, and I gave your posts the stick.

      You know I’ll call your banning here a “flounce”
      Though I’ve been waiting for some time to pounce
      On your account, and with prevarications
      Distort and demonize your observations.
      The Toad Hall where you reveled, if you please’ll
      Be given entire to the stoats and weasels,
      
My countenance beaming on each one that
      Comes to me bearing tales of Mole or Rat,

      Or Badger, or…sockpuppet. No, ‘t was not

      This writing only, placed you on the spot

      And caused me to invoke the ban: perhaps

      You chanced to differ with my own claptrap
      And stick to your position, or dispute
      Conventional wisdoms to which repute

      I’ve lately granted. Don’t you dare to say

      That I or my site might have lost their way
      Obsessing on my personal vendettas;
      
I am neither forgiving nor forgetter,

      And will not brook a failure of obesiance

      By anyone I feel owes me allegiance.
      Yes, I took Rather down, on grounds that he
      Could not support what he claimed factually;
      But now I set my sights at lower bar
      (On personalities, not things that are)
      While I squat ‘midst the wreckage I have made
      Like mad Kurtz ruling from his bush stockade,
      Ringed ’round with skulls. For I no longer deign
      To weigh a fact itself; instead, maintain

      That source determines truth, and to that end
      The nature of veracity I bend,
      Citing to midden-heaps of rankness such

      That I would not long since have scorned to touch.

      A turtle is a lizard in a shell,
      And I, lord of my self-created hell

      Remain King Yertle of the Turtle Stack
      
Exalted on my Posting Turtles’ backs—
      Yet conscious, as I proclaim my renown
      
It’s just posting turtles, all the way down,
      
Which is why I respond with rage and fear

      Should anyone mouth what I deem a sneer

      Or contradiction. So I flip a switch,
      And all posts stop together, with a bitch

      Given reign of my elegant designs.

      Yet, if I still retained but half a spine

      I would despise appearing to be led

      As I now seem to, by the lesser head.

      Hark! Look you! See how Glenn Beck weeps!

      Do you not loathe the company he keeps
      Regardless of whatever he might say?
      Here is the global warming word today; 

      Do not dissent, the banning stick is toward
      I care for no voice save that of accord!

  16. OldLineTexan says:

    yankintheeu :I didn’t know he actually deleted ALL of buzzsawmonkey’s archived posts, not merely the ones at the end. Is that not so incredibly weird?

    Stalkers like Charles are weird.

    Isn’t that right, Dark Falcon?

  17. Juan Epstein says:

    How many just left, without being banned?

    Are they now banned because of not posting for 3 months?

    • snowcrash says:

      Many just walked away, but if they continued to use their nic at an “unapproved site” and a little birdy reported them, they got blocked. I did not know there was a time expiration attached to posting privileges. Is this new?

      • Juan Epstein says:

        Dune strategy.

        Fighting sleepers by banning anyone who hadn’t posted in 3 months.

        I walked. Don’t know if I’m banned.
        Dude knows my real name.

        The SLEEPER MUST AWAKEN!!

    • Emperor says:

      I just walked away and left, myself. My account is not among the banned either.

      • Grand Junctionite says:

        I just walked away. I saw my nic on the newest list of the banned, so I assume the little birdy caught me posting here.

    • Nodrog says:

      The classic member who left, but is not yet banned, AFAIK, is Zulubaby. She had tens of thousands of posts, and thousands before registration. About 2006 she became very infrequent, and last appeared in 2008, asking why her friend Joel had been banned. She got no answer, and has not appeared on LGF since.

      She stayed classy, where the rest of us couldn’t resist getting ourselves booted.

  18. Nodrog says:

    Excellent work, Chen! You’ve left my pioneering legacy in the dust.

  19. buzzsawmonkey says:

    The McDonald’s Blog! Over 4 million deleted!

    Make sure to get your Sappy Meal with miniature iceweasel strap-on toy!

  20. Juan Epstein says:

    Where is the most updated List of the Banned?

  21. Grand Junctionite says:

    Juan Epstein :Dune strategy.
    Fighting sleepers by banning anyone who hadn’t posted in 3 months.
    I walked. Don’t know if I’m banned.Dude knows my real name.
    The SLEEPER MUST AWAKEN!!

    Juan Epstein is not on the list, if that was your LGF nic. Although you will be when the little birdy sees this.

  22. Overlook says:

    “Did you notice that buzzsawmonkey and song_and_dance_man both have one (1) comment left standing in the archives? Well, why?”

    To stand, like Ozymandias’s legs, as mocking reminders of former glory? To make the multitudes aware of the power of the Wally of Wallies?

  23. Nodrog says:

    Daedalus :Zulubaby is probably banned now that she was mentioned!

    I’ve mentioned her in other places too, and last time I checked, she remained a viable LGF member.

    • Daedalus says:

      Ah OK! Chuck reads this blog religiously so hopefully she’s doesn’t get banned from this.

  24. Rightymouse says:

    I hope you loverly folks don’t forget about those of us who simply walked away when LGF became really nasty/weirdorama. IIRC, it was 2008 or 2009 for me. Can’t be bothered to check. All I remember was that Irish Rose was still posting. Can still log in. Tried this week.

    • snowcrash says:

      You might not be able to after today. Seriously. Ask DaddG aka bureaucrat. The little birdy is quite an informer.

  25. snowcrash says:

    Bonus quiz answer, Is it a trap sprung when searching the archives for those nics?

  26. Opilio says:

    buzzsawmonkey :
    I have no clue what vestige he left there.

    This alone escaped the Reaper’s scythe:

    121 buzzsawmonkey Aug 17, 2009 15:18:14 +17

    re:#57:LudwigVanQuixote

    I would add, by the way, that the difference between the fringe loonies depicted in the pictures above and a nice fat slice of the Administration’s inner circle is less a matter of substance than a matter of style. In short, they know how to wear suits and speak in modulated tones–but that doesn’t mean they don’t vibrate in total sympathy with the sentiments expressed in the signs being waved by the ragtag and bobtail in the street. And they have a filibuster-proof majority at the moment.

    Sufficient sanity prevailed to prevent–thus far–the war crimes trials demanded by these street myrmidons. But I, for one, have not forgotten that some of the nice clean folks in suits were actually entertaining the notion with some seriousness.

    • buzzsawmonkey says:

      Ah—that explains it. Some time back, Mad King Yertle was yapping about some poster I’d never heard of over at Roger Stacy McCain’s blog, which I’d never visited, and falsely accusing me of being that other poster because the other poster had apparently used the word “myrmidons,” which appears in the post you quote.

      The fact that “myrmidon” is not an unusual word—at least, not if you’ve read a few Greek myths—and that words are there for anyone to use, seems to have escaped the Mad King. The illiterate boob was dead certain that I was posting under a sock, which is something I’ve never bothered to do. Clearly, Yertle restored this post during his throes in the grip of that particular delusion, to provide some kind of half-assed “proof” that I was Other Poster X.

      What’s really pathetic about that episode is that it shows Yertle to have been poring obsessively over my deleted 45,000-post oeuvre; how else could he pluck from that mass a single post with a single—to him—telltale word?

      It’s nice to have so devoted a reader, but really—what a maroon.

      • Walter von Dichische says:

        So that one remains because it’s his “proof”?

      • Opilio says:

        Believe it or not, I used the word oeuvre in a semi-private correspondence just yesterday. Hence, you and I are the same person.

        Who knew?

      • beed says:

        Well, at least two good things have come out of this whole myrmidon:

        1. I will use the word religiously from now on, and
        2. never once look it up to find out what it actually means.

      • buzzsawmonkey says:

        beed: The Myrmidons were the soldiers Achilles brought with him to the Trojan War; hence, they are one’s soldiers/allies/entourage—one’s “peeps,” if you will.

        Arguably, the cultists of Yertle’s pond are his myrmidons—but, actually, the whole place is a mere midden heap.

      • snowcrash says:

        Lol, I just opened dictionary.com in another tab. Thank you buzz.

      • beed says:

        Buzz, I knew. But getting it wrong is more fun.

      • buzzsawmonkey says:

        Me, I just wanted a chance to use the “mere midden heap” pun.

      • yep, CJ “reappeared” that one comment so he could link to it as “proof”.

    • buzzsawmonkey says:

      Walter: It’s the only thing I can figure, since he was honking about “myrmidons.”

      Opilio: It’s all thanks to Yertle’s mad korrelayshun skilz.

  27. DEZ says:

    Grand Junctionite :
    Or two quarter pounders with sleeze

    I think you just described her moobs.
    I gotta go hurl now.

    • Princess Natasha says:

      Dude… DUDE!! You just started a hurling chain-reaction. I am not normally a sympathetic hurler, but this calls for it. I’ll be back after I pay my respects to St. Ralph of the Swirling Waters.

  28. sacred ham says:

    Dunno if this one has been mentioned before:

    333 Charles
    6/12/2008 9:20:21 pm PDT

    re: #327 Killgore Trout

    Fjordy stinks.

    I’ve actually considered going through the LGF archives and deleting all my posts that link to his articles, now that I see clearly what he’s promoting.

    But I have an aversion to revisionism. If someone tries to smear me with those posts at some point, I’ll simply admit that I was wrong about Fjordman. Because I was.

  29. lmao says:

    All I can ever do is lmao when I read this stuff about that blog. Wonder how he pays his bills now? Wonder how much revenue he use to get from all the people he banned. I know what I use to contribute to that site and now I wish I had not but it was a fun place to be once upon a time.

  30. statistician says:

    buzzsawmonkey :
    Ah—that explains it. Some time back, Mad King Yertle was yapping about some poster I’d never heard of over at Roger Stacy McCain’s blog, which I’d never visited, and falsely accusing me of being that other poster because the other poster had apparently used the word “myrmidons,” which appears in the post you quote.

    Here’s a list of LGF commenters with original (not included by quote) uses of the word “myrmidon” prior to buzzsaw’s comment above: A!an (1), Kragar (proud to be kafir) (2), Quilly Mammoth (1), Stuck-in-CA (1), Kustie the Klown (1), Clutch (2), rickatLandstuhl (6), babbazee (1), fearless freep (1), Wendya (5), coz (1), vxbush (1), Gmac (1), TalkinKamel (2), Viking6 (1), redmirabai (1).

  31. Rightymouse says:

    sacred ham :He revised his opinion of revisionism!

    And denied revising the revisionism!

  32. William Standish Knowels says:

    Florida GOP Senator Resurrects Failed 2009 Creationism Bill
    Anti-evolution bill makes a comeback, with more Republicans in the legislature
    Charles Johnson
    WINGNUTS • Wed Mar 16, 2011 at 12:54 pm PDT • Views: 3,489

    127 ozbloke
    Wed, Mar 16, 2011 4:21:41pm

    127 comments in the middle of the day in ~ 3.5 hrs.
    Hows that “Why I” thing working out for you?
    At this rate you will make 9m sometime around May Day.

  33. sacred ham says:

    I just noticed that Herman Cain post (with a side order of Gellerstalking!) from earlier this afternoon.

    It’s sad to see how much hatred Chuck has for blacks and women.

    /

  34. Rightymouse says:

    sacred ham :He also revised his opinion about admitting when he was wrong.

    It takes a mature person to admit when they’re wrong. Charles has reverted to his 2nd or 3rd childhood. Mommies & Daddies are wrong/to blame at that stage of life.

    • sacred ham says:

      He was against revisionism and for admitting when he was wrong before he was for revisionism and against admitting when he was wrong.

  35. snowcrash says:

    The blogster ate my thank you to buzz. He saved me a trip to dictionary.com

    • beed says:

      Is that spam in your pocket or are you just happy to post?

      • snowcrash says:

        beed, it is getting irritating. I think the blog is trying to tell me something.

      • beed says:

        If you go, I go. Screw LGF!

      • snowcrash says:

        Thanks, yeah. I have to ask chen what the deal is.

      • Walter von Dichische says:

        The deal is simple. Nobody understands the WordPress spam filter. It just goes weirod for no apparent reason. Happens to other WP blogs, too.

        Maybe it’s an omen of things to come as we attempt more and more artificial intelligence.

      • snowcrash says:

        Thanks, Walt. Thought I was doing something that tripped the spam filter. It is what it is.

      • poteen says:

        “—–The deal is simple. Nobody understands the WordPress spam filter. It just goes weirod for no apparent reason. Happens to other WP blogs, too.

        Maybe it’s an omen of things to come as we attempt more and more artificial intelligence.—–”

        Skynet becoming self-aware? Should we call Arnold? He’s out of work right now.

  36. ryannon says:

    lmao :
    All I can ever do is lmao when I read this stuff about that blog. Wonder how he pays his bills now? Wonder how much revenue he use to get from all the people he banned. I know what I use to contribute to that site and now I wish I had not but it was a fun place to be once upon a time.

    I used to contribute as well. Do you think Chuck will give me a refund now that he’s banned me?

  37. Rightymouse says:

    sacred ham :He was against revisionism and for admitting when he was wrong before he was for revisionism and against admitting when he was wrong.

    That’s one reason why people think the man has lost his bloody mind!

    • sacred ham says:

      Going back through the archives, I see that Chuck’s usual explanation for why he was banning people around 2007-2008 was somewhat different than what he now says in retrospect. Back then, he would commonly refer to the banned as “deranged” or “mental cases.” Now, he says that he got rid of people who were “racists” and “bigots” and doesn’t refer to them being mentally ill, with the occasional exception when he describes “stalkers.” My guess would be that he thought it would be hard for even his new, gullible supporters to believe that thousands of former lizards were all mentally ill nutjobs without his having noticed for several years, whereas he now thinks he can get away with claiming that he thought they were only against radical Islam, but later discovered, “when he started paying attention” that they were actually evil racist bigot xenophobes. And of course, among liberals it’s totally PC and highly effective to smear someone by calling them a racist, whereas it’s a bit riskier to viciously attack someone who supposedly has mental health issues, so he reserves that tag for the smaller group of people who seriously piss him off by constantly reminding him what a lying hypocrite he is.

      • Rightymouse says:

        He’s an ‘interesting’ case, that’s for sure. We wouldn’t be here otherwise.

        I changed political parties after 9/11 and became conservative. Charles did that too. Or so he said at the time.

        The difference is that his change was apparently shallow and rather meaningless. Methinks he has difficulty with commitment, honesty and self-awareness. He also uses people.

      • Walter von Dichische says:

        Then there are the “creeps” and the people threatening his life. That’s gotta be a couple thousand right there.

    • FerdBurfel says:

      There is no thinking needed, it’s a bleeding certainty he has gone bonkers.

  38. lmao says:

    ryannon :

    lmao :
    All I can ever do is lmao when I read this stuff about that blog. Wonder how he pays his bills now? Wonder how much revenue he use to get from all the people he banned. I know what I use to contribute to that site and now I wish I had not but it was a fun place to be once upon a time.

    I used to contribute as well. Do you think Chuck will give me a refund now that he’s banned me?

    No, you will not and all you can hope for at this point is not to be outed for your contributions.

  39. ryannon says:

    lmao :

    ryannon :

    lmao :
    All I can ever do is lmao when I read this stuff about that blog. Wonder how he pays his bills now? Wonder how much revenue he use to get from all the people he banned. I know what I use to contribute to that site and now I wish I had not but it was a fun place to be once upon a time.

    I used to contribute as well. Do you think Chuck will give me a refund now that he’s banned me?

    No, you will not and all you can hope for at this point is not to be outed for your contributions.

    I could give a shit about being outed.

    Bring it on.

  40. Mr Caps says:

    lmao :
    All I can ever do is lmao when I read this stuff about that blog. Wonder how he pays his bills now? Wonder how much revenue he use to get from all the people he banned. I know what I use to contribute to that site and now I wish I had not but it was a fun place to be once upon a time.

    If he hadn’t gone off the deep end he would have cleaned up financially, with people donating and through advertisements he could of been somebody.

  41. freetaxeskill says:

    Of some note:

    On the number of people buying “anti nuke sick pills” in the U.S.A..

    Some say, why is this that there are people this dumb.

    Easy 51% of U.S. voted for Obama and the loon ass commie Democrats.

    keep it simple

  42. freetaxeskill says:

    Hi Ludwigged,

    I’m posting with you and the other kooks on lgf’s today.

    You seem to accept me now much better.

    Thanks
    tfk

  43. freetaxeskill says:

    ps

    Can not ask this over there Ludwigg. This thing with Harry Reid not allowing the spent nuke rods to be stored at the Yucca Mountain Nuke Site. Seems that resulted in all the rods being stored just like the 6 and 7 units over there. Just in open pools with little security, and thus subject to many outside forces of nature and possible terrorist acts.

    Tell us over there how that is a good thing, and please use little words us wingnuts can understand.

    Like,,Open storage of spent nuke rods above ground is good, and the way Harry got it done the big power companies get paid lots of tax money for this open storage above ground.

    Gee Harry is one smart guy, did Obama know him back in the day???

  44. Joest73 says:

    I’m number 1919 on the list. I think I was banned for making a comment about his hero Rachel Maddow. I wasn’t trusted because I was one of those class of ’04’ers.

  45. garycooper says:

    Of course Lewdy Doomsday is rolling in the Japanese crisis like a dog on a rotten fish. He’s in heaven, with the hope of a total meltdown followed by massive casualties. It’s what he lives for.

  46. Bagua says:

    * Ludwig the Slut Shaming Scientist™ is in a class of his own.

    (I pity his students)

    • Bagua says:

      Also, Ludwig would not dare comment about science on a site where he did not have the protection of the ban stick and his sycophants. He tried something similar on the Yeshiva site and had to slink away to nurse his hurt, and declare victory at LGF.

      • Walter von Dichische says:

        You just got dissed…

        354 Floral Giraffe Wed, Mar 16, 2011 9:12:22pm

        re: #352 LudwigVanQuixote

        Bagua was nice enough to support me, but he’s NOT a scientist like you are.
        Weak arguments = FAIL.
        LVQ is a proven scientist.
        2.0 is weak.

        😛

      • Walter von Dichische says:

        Oh, Biff! Pow! Zammo!

        352 LudwigVanQuixote Wed, Mar 16, 2011 9:10:01pm

        re: #343 Dark_Falcon

        A left that did not suffer fools would have to rid itself of Pete Stark and Barbara Mikulski. The Dems are most unlikely to wean themselves of hacks, as any part will always have its share of fools and hacks.

        You should also know that Bagua is blogstalking you. Again.

        [waves to the Stalkers]

        Bagua is always blog stalking me, ever since he was outed as a liar and a fraud on science matters multiple times.

        I love how he used to go on and on about how nothing is ever certain in science, and that no predictive models are certain.

        Outside of the the trivial philosophical nonsense like this could all be a dream and nothing is real, what kind of a deluded mental midget thinks such things? I remember the time I crushed him about certainties.

        Take the orbit of the Earth around the sun. This was a mathematically motivated model of reality that was posited by Copernicus because it was vastly more elegant then epicycles.

        It took Kepler, Galileo and Newton to put the full theory and observation together.

        Does he deny that this is a 100% certain picture of reality? OF course he does without realizing it.

        Then there was that paper he kept going on and on about that was retracted by the authors – even after it was retracted and dozens of counter examples were brought up. The man is an utter fool with delusions of grandeur. I would pity him if I didn’t know he had a little shrine to me that he sacrificed kittens at every night.

        Damn, he’s getting frixy…

      • Bagua says:

        I’m cool with Floral Giraffe. She’s a nice lady and doesn’t presume to know about science.

        Unlike the clown Ludwig who I spanked many times on LGF. He can spread his little lies in the safety of his protected blog of sycophants, but he can not come here and debate me like an actual scientist would.

        Ludwig makes false claims as to his knowledge and field, and posts perversions of science that are both pathetic and hilarious.

        I find him a riot and enjoy exposing his scientific illiteracy. He is lucky to have somebody willing to take the time to parody him.

      • Bagua says:

        Of course, he makes a strawman. I never disputed the orbit of the earth around the sun. I disputed Ludwig’s perversions of science and immature level misunderstanding of statistics and uncertainty.

        But as is not allowed to come debate, and requires the permission of an unemployed musician, all he can do is fume and insult in his fetid little pond.

  47. Bagua says:

    Ps. Dark Falcon, what you are doing is stalking. I hope you enjoy the consequences.

  48. Bagua says:

    Parting gift for Ludwig:

    Bagua :
    Good fisking of the Global Warming Hoax™ from downunder.

  49. sacred ham says:

    Take the orbit of the Earth around the sun. This was a mathematically motivated model of reality that was posited by Copernicus because it was vastly more elegant then epicycles.

    It took Kepler, Galileo and Newton to put the full theory and observation together.

    Does he deny that this is a 100% certain picture of reality?

    100% certain? Perfect guaranteed prediction, forever? The Sun will never burn out, and you know for a fact that there will never be an asteroid or cometary impact that will scramble the orbits? And even without that, if you mean Newtonian physics, no it’s definitely not “100% certain,” unless you think the planets follow perfect elliptical orbits and that relativistic effects don’t exist. Of course, you never actually said anything specific enough to really debate, since you were in too much of a hurry to proclaim it “100% certain.”

    To paraphrase that other silly loozard, “Ludwig is proof that there are no perfect ellipses in nature.”

    • Briareus says:

      Humans have several corporeal sphinctors, but Ludwig is the biggest one by far.

    • sacred ham says:

      And shortly after I posted that, Ludwig bid adieu to the adoring crowd:

      But alas, it is late and I must sign off.

      Ta ta, Ludwig! Until we meet again!

      He’s not even a sphincter, he’s a fake character. Could be a Chucksock, who knows, but he’s not a scientist. His flamboyantly goofy comments aren’t even believable fiction. It’s fun to mock him, but he’s a self-parody to begin with.

  50. mattm says:

    Besides the banned and blocked commenters, many just gave up and left and never returned. Thousand of years old comments form people who just forgot about LGF.

    • Yea, but you’d expect that for any site that has been around as long as LGF has. And you’d also expect any site to ban the worst trolls and loosest cannons.

      It’s these stats that any objective observer would find astounding.

  51. anonymous says:

    I’m #421 on the list and when out in epic fashion when I confronted Irish Hose on threatening posters on other blogs

    • Joest73 says:

      I had one of the lgf zombies “out” me because they found that I “like” Sarah Palin and Beck on Facebook page.