This has got to be the most transparent example of cut-and-paste blogging displayed yet at the BVoAF:
Note that he displays this somewhat technical argument, posing by it, without displaying any evidence that he actually has the foggiest idea what it means.
Poser.
 | rightymouse on Them be some fat stompy feets,… |
| rightymouse on Them be some fat stompy feets,… |
| rightymouse on Them be some fat stompy feets,… |
| rightymouse on Them be some fat stompy feets,… |
| rightymouse on Them be some fat stompy feets,… |
| rightymouse on Them be some fat stompy feets,… |
| rightymouse on Them be some fat stompy feets,… |
| rightymouse on Them be some fat stompy feets,… |
| rightymouse on Them be some fat stompy feets,… |
| rightymouse on Them be some fat stompy feets,… |
 | Octopus on Them be some fat stompy feets,… |
| Octopus on Them be some fat stompy feets,… |
| rightymouse on Them be some fat stompy feets,… |
 | Bunk X on The New LGF Look is a Clu… |
| Octopus on The New LGF Look is a Clu… |
The Blogmocracy
The Diary of Daedalus 
As Cato said “The content is rather thin”.
The Ogre was right.
The content is inversely proportional to the girth of the content provider.
These are terrible times to be without an in-house scientist.
Once again poor planning on Chunks part.
Free LvQ!!! Free LvQ!!! Free LvQ!!! Free LvQ!!!
Charles Nodickens? What is your serious issues?
Thread will go OT very early.
I have a brother-in-law who’s an MD specializing in research on infectious disease. I consider myself a decent reader of scientific jargon, but when he cranks up the chemistry in one of his published papers like this writer is doing, no layman can pretend to know what’s going on. The fact that Fatass posts this piece on his site, as if he has the vaguest clue about its meaning, is funnier than snowflakes in Cancun for the AGW-conference. 🙂
(no, it’s not really snowing down there…just “unseasonably cold”)
Yes!! Let him OUT, Fatass! He’s been punished long enough. 😉
Yeah. He’s just a scapegoat, just like Assange. Ain’t at right, Chuck?
He ripped off a scientific paper without knowing WTF is says.
Dihydrogen monoxide is EVIL too, right Chuck?
What’s the point of quoting those paragraphs, which in turn only make any sense if you can look at figure S2, without showing figure S2?
These cells arefake obviously. They are all lacking globular clusters.
This is kind of rich, given some of James Hansen’s slipshod product:
Umm…
Heh. Let the drums roll, hear our battle cry!
Do you know these life forms or what?
First comment:
Sun, Dec 12, 2010 12:43:09pm
OT@ comment:
18 Slumbering Behemoth
Sun, Dec 12, 2010 1:43:23pm
“re: #17 Varek Raith
Nobody likes to go caroling with Yoda.”
“On the internet, everyone is a Rocket scientist”
-Foster’s Home For Imaginary AGW, Dec. 2009
Or a person who operates on brains.
On the plus side, LGF did prove informative today, as I made sure to change my gawker password.
See? That’s worth $10.
Blogmaster: Please check you email.
I saw it. Good catch.
posted it up
He’s just trying to portray himself as someone who’s pro-science without having any idea what the article means. Poor effort from Chuck.
Exactly the point. Poser.
Chuckles thinks a base pair is what he plays with though the hole in his pocket.
Chuck… He puts the “arse” in “arsenic”. What a total douchebag! LOL